![]() ![]() Still, you will be missing proper support, documentation of some may be lacking/confusing, and incorporating some functionality may give you extra headaches. I’d say there’s no feature at least one of the players above does not offer, and long gone are the days when these were thought of as less stable or in any way substandard. Do however take the time to make a more educated choice if you need comercial features, a couple of those down the line have some interesting key strengths.įor the most part, you are. Let me once again mention the tester, that’ll give you a quick glimpse of them all remember most can be skinned tho, albeit some easier, fancier and/or more efficiently than others.įor what it’s worth, Video.js is the widest used by far, and the listing order roughly matches their popularity. Second most important is the looks, and that’s kind of natural. Fair enough, as having prior exposure to a product may greatly speed up deployment time just be sure you’re not missing out on what the others have to offer. I can tell you there’s a lot of criteria one may choose a player for, and interestingly, the strongest is personal preference. Commercial features Playerįor your project, I don’t know… It will be your job to match the features to your needs, further look into the details and test to be sure it’s the right choice. In case it’s not obvious, many of the “✓” are hyperlinks pointing to some page/article best describing the topic. Note that a “?” means unknown or undocumented. For instance, dash.js and hls.js are used as protocol clients for many other players. In this context, “library” means that some of the respective player’s features library can be easily used into some other player or context. Also as part of the effort, took the time to put together a one-page HLS URL tester that lets you check out your own stream against any of the players. Instead of a boring exhaustive comparative analysis, I’ll try to just list all that are relevant along with as many key features and information, in a setup that’s compact and easy to digest. Not including the commercial products that offer a free starter alternative, free players that are tied to a commercial platform, not even the free ones that encompass proprietary technology.Įven so there’s a lot of them. This one is just about the completely free and open players. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |